• 14May
    Posted by: James Parsons Categories: chapter event Comments: 0

    IABC/DC Member and communication consultant Daria Steigman blogs about last week’s Chapter Meeting with John Gundlach., Senior Vice President and Group Creative Director at GMMB

  • 30Apr
    Posted by: James Parsons Categories: Uncategorized, chapter event, independent practitioners Comments: 0

    IABC/DC Metro’s Independents Special Interest Group is back with a program on networking, a skill that can often make the difference between successful business development and scouring job postings.

    Juli Monroe, coach, speaker, and author of The Enthusiastic Networker will discuss “Effective Networking for the Independent Consultant” at a special breakfast meeting on May 17. More details at iabcdcmetro.org.

  • 25Apr
    Posted by: James Parsons Categories: Silver Inkwell, awards Comments: 0

    Information about IABC/DC Metro’s 2012 Silver Inkwell Awards is now available at the Silver Inkwell section of iabcdcmetro.org. Get the scoop on how to submit an entry, deadlines, fees, and more.

    The June 15 Early Bird deadline will be here before you know it, so why wait? Get started on your Silver Inkwell entry(ies) tody!

  • 14Apr

    The results of the “Lightning Round” that closed our April chapter meeting, Selling Communication Programs to the C-Suite, are now on the News page of iabcdcmetro.org.

    If you missed the meeting (or were there and couldn’t write fast enough!), these key points will help you garner support from the higher-ups at your organization.

  • 11Apr
    Posted by: James Parsons Categories: IABC International, awards, recognition Comments: 0

    IABC/DC Metro member John Clemons, ABC, APR, has been named an IABC Fellow, the association’s highest honor. More details are right here.

    John is the chapter’s fourth current Fellow, joining Al Wann, ABC, APR (1991); Les Potter, ABC (1997); and Jim Shaffer (1999).

  • 26Mar
    Posted by: James Parsons Categories: chapter member Comments Off

    Longtime IABC/DC Metro supporter Kate Perrin of PRofessional Solutions is interviewed for the Washington Post’s Capital Business section. IABC gets a mention (well, 3/4 of one anyway).  Congrats and thanks for all your good work, Kate!

  • 26Mar
    Posted by: James Parsons Categories: chapter event, hot topics in communications, writing Comments Off

    Slides from Mike Long’s presentation at the March Chapter Meeting are now available on the News page of iabcdcmetro.org.

    Many thanks to Mike for making them available to our entire membership.

  • 19Mar
    Posted by: Damien Skinner Categories: Organizational Insight, Q&A, RFP, Request for Proposals, current issues Comments Off

    The Request for Proposal (RFP) is a tool organizations use, not only to determine the best suppliers to work with; it also identifies and clearly states the risks and benefits. It allows the supplier to display their capabilities and expertise. The RFP process can become daunting and confusing if the RFP lacks structure, it can inspire more questions than opportunities to showcase the suppliers’ acumen.

    We have invited Robert Udowitz (RU) and Steven Drake (SD), principals, at RFP Associates, LLC to join us for a two-part post series regarding the RFP process. RFP Associates provides guidance toward a mutually beneficial business experience for both the organization and the agency.

    IABC|DC Metro: Do you find that most requesting organizations don’t know the real purpose of the RFP or they don’t know what they really want in a project?

    RU/SD: It’s not that there’s a lack of knowledge about RFPs, it’s more that there’s a lack of experience with them. Unless you’ve worked in new business at a PR agency you’re not going to come across many RFPs over the course of your career.  So how could you be expected to know which direction to take or what’s best to focus on without the help of a company specializing in the process? Our role, first, is to assess what an organization wants to achieve by hiring an agency. Yes, that includes the scope of work, budget, and more, but many times that includes ensuring you have the internal resources to support an outside firm.

    IABC | DC Metro: What is the biggest mistake organizations make when developing their RFP?

    RU/SD: There is frequently a rush to the finish line once an organization starts the process. However, searching for an agency shouldn’t be hurried. That can be a great disservice to your organization and the agency you hire, and can often result in ill will by the end of the relationship. Organizations also tend not to be as comprehensive as they should be, omitting details as specific as the context for the search and the goals, or as administrative as contact names, deadlines, and a timeline for the process.

    IABC | DC Metro: What is a piece of information most organizations leave out of the RFP, they think is not important, but makes it difficult for communicators to respond effectively to the RFP?

     RU/SD: As we mentioned, relevant details and historical context. When preparing an RFP you have to remember that knowledge is power and the more information you provide the agencies the more of an intelligent response you can expect – and demand. Too often RFPs create a guessing game or require research for the basics, when providing some simple details could help responding agencies focus on more important components of what you need.

    RFPs should not be about testing how good one’s research is but, rather, how smart they can be with all the information presented before them. We’ll add, of course, that you should require a non-disclosure form before sharing your RFP with any agency

    IABC|DC Metro: What impact has social media had on RFP/agency search process

    RU/SD: Organizations shouldn’t, necessarily, create an RFP with social media in mind. They should let the agencies make their suggestions, which hopefully are grounded in some rationale and research. Social media is the next evolution in PR, many agencies have embraced it, and there are some that clearly make it their specialty. It is one tactic or communications channel, however, and therefore should be presented in the context, typically, of a broader, strategic communications program.

    IABC | DC Metro: What should the organization be looking for in the agency’s response to the RFP?

    RU/SD: This often depends on the topic and the issuing organization. Generally sought qualities include experience in a specific industry/field, knowledge of what’s going on and who the players are, and a demonstrated ability to offer creative, results-oriented strategic counsel. There are times, though, when an agency can provide the right skill set and ideas even though it hasn’t worked in a specific industry.

    IABC | DC Metro: What is the impact of a poorly developed RFP?

    RU/SD: Dissatisfaction all around. It will start without a direction of where to start and end with miscommunication and confused expectations. Often times it will end with little outcome for the project or plan.

    IABC | DC Metro: How can a properly developed RFP be a great tool in the search for a communications firm/consultant?

    RU/SD: This is why a proper structure is so critical – it creates a course to follow, demands specific outcomes, is reasonable with its timeline and allows for success.

    Look for part two of this post. Robert and Steven explore the RFP from the agency point-of-view.

    RFP Associates

  • 11Feb
    Posted by: Damien Skinner Categories: Uncategorized Comments Off

    Our February chapter meeting provided important lessons learned about managing a crisis in real time from Monique Hanis, the director of communications and spokesperson for the Solar Energy Industries Association, and Robert Rehg, president of Edelman Washington, DC.

    Some key takeaways from Monique and Robert:

    Monique Hanis:

    ·      Have a microsite or dark website in place before a crisis. It is too difficult in the middle of a crisis to launch a new site or add pages to an existing site.

    ·      Have a hard copy of your crisis plan at the office and at home. You never know when a computer system will crash or when inclement weather will keep you from the office.

    ·      When the dust settles, update your communications plan
    Robert Rehg:

    ·      Prepare for a crisis before you’re in one.

    ·      Focus on positive messaging and stick to your message points.

    ·      Bloggers can be very helpful in stamping out a fire before it becomes a general media story.

    If you missed this event, you can follow the conversation on Twitter using #IABCDC, @SolarMonique, @RobRehg

  • 06Feb
    Posted by: Damien Skinner Categories: Uncategorized, hot topics in communications Comments Off

    Crisis Communications is an important consideration for all organizations. It is also the focus of the IABC/DC Metro February chapter meeting. We have invited Donald Goldberg, Partner at Bluetext to join us for a Q&A post about crisis communications.

    IABC/DC Metro:  What is the biggest communications mistake companies/groups make in dealing with a crisis?

    Don: There’s no shortage to the mistakes that I see companies making every time there’s a crisis. First and foremost, as the recent Susan G. Komen case clearly demonstrates, is not having a process in place that analyzes key decisions ahead of time through the filter of a communications perspective. Too often, business leaders make a business decision that gets blessed by the lawyers, but no one is included who can raise red flags on how it will be received by customers or other key audiences. In many cases that I’ve been involved with, the communications team isn’t even included in the decision-making process until too late. The second mistake is not arming their front-line people with talking points and key arguments before-hand. It’s not just the head of an organization or the spokesperson who has to defend a company in a crisis—it’s the business leaders who have clients and employees asking questions. A manager’s “Tool Box” with key messages, Q&As, and other materials is essential.

    IABC/DC Metro:  How quickly should companies react when a crisis occurs?

    Don: This is a very difficult question, and one that often trips up even the most sophisticated companies. One of the hardest decisions to make early on is whether the situation actually has reached the level of a communications crisis. We have a strict rule that says, “First, do no harm.” It can easily be the case that an issue would not receive any public attention except for the fact that the company elevated it to that level by responding too quickly, for example, to an obscure blog posting that would otherwise never get any traction. Having said that, once it is clear that a crisis is imminent, I believe it is essential to address the issue as quickly as possible so that the company and not its adversaries is controlling the message (as best it can).

    IABC/DC Metro:   What digital communications channel would you use first in a crisis, why?

    Don: I think this depends on the company, and how it best communicates with its key audiences. For many consumer companies, Twitter and Facebook are the way to respond, because unlike a press release that relies on the filters of reporters and editors to interpret, these social media properties are immediate and are a direct avenue to customers. But for many B-to-B and B-to-G companies, especially in the Washington region, a blog posting or even an old-fashioned letter to key audiences (delivered via e-mail) can frame the situation better than the very short postings that Twitter allows. Companies should not suddenly turn on a Twitter account that it hasn’t used just because it’s in a crisis—they should stick to platforms that they are comfortable with and that they have been using.

     

    IABC/DC Metro:   In general, what internal positions and policies have you found to be the biggest obstacle when dealing with a crisis?

    Don: The biggest mistake I see routinely is companies and organizations going public with statements that have not been well-thought out for the end game—which is to get the crisis behind it as quickly as possible. It is very important to play the situation out through half-dozen or more chess moves, and not just be reactive to the immediate noise. In the midst of a crisis, the company quite frequently doesn’t yet know all of the facts, and public statements need to acknowledge that. You never want to draw a line in the sand that you later have to walk back from because new information comes out contradicting the position. The other mistake, which is a difficult one, is not knowing when to cut-and-run, but instead hanging on to an untenable position for too long. Penn State did this in the Paterno scandal, and Susan G. Komen did this last week in the Planned Parenthood fiasco. There is no benefit for taking a beating and then folding to the pressure. If you’re going to cave, cave early to minimize the damage.

    IABC/DC Metro:   Any other insights or wisdom you would like to share?

    Don: Most important is not to take crisis planning for granted. It is far too easy to put this off, or not get executive buy-in with pre-planning. Bring in a specialist who has been through these situations many times (shameless plug for folks like myself), because a crisis is not something that most communications people have experienced.

     

    Don Goldberg, is a Partner at Bluetext with more than 30 years of experience as a communications professional in Washington as an award-winning journalist, senior Congressional staffer and senior member of President Clinton’s communication steam. He is a frequent commentator on Fox News and CNN, and a guest speaker on crisis communications, including annual addresses to the Harvard Business School (HBS) through its Outstanding Speakers Series.